Response to Resident’s article by BishopAccountability.org
When Pope Francis travels to a country where the clergy sex abuse crisis has erupted, he meets with victims, expresses shame and sorrow, and promises change. He did this during his 2015 visit to the United States, his visit to Chile in January 2018, his visit to Ireland in August 2018, and his visit to Canada in 2022.
But when the Pope visits a country where the bishops are not reckoning with headlines about abuse, he does not meet with victims. He did not hold such meetings in Hungary, the Congo, Romania, or Panama, even though the church’s victims in each of those countries surely also number in the thousands.
The Pope’s meetings with victims are about public relations, not change. And at this point in his papacy, the tactic is not only tired, it’s cynical. An apology without true reform is worse than meaningless. It’s disrespectful.
In his ten years as pope, Francis has refused to implement a true “zero tolerance” law to stop abusers. Under canon law, guilty priests can receive any of a range of penalities, and while some have been laicized, many are given temporary suspensions and returned to ministry. This is why the Portuguese bishops who have returned credibly accused priests to parishes are in no danger of losing their prestigious jobs or titles. Those bishops aren’t violating canon law; they’re following it.
The thousands of people who were sexually abused as children in the Portuguese church deserve better. They deserve the “concrete actions” that the Pope repeatedly has promised. It is not too late for Francis to restore his credibility as a reformer. He could take these basic and crucial steps to stop clergy sexual abuse and its cover-up in Portugal and elsewhere:
1. He could change universal canon law to enact true “zero tolerance” for sexual abusers in the priesthood. This would mean that a cleric found guilty of even a single act of child molestation would be removed permanently from ministry. To our knowledge, the only national bishops’ policy that comes close to “zero tolerance,” at least on paper, is that passed by the U.S. bishops in 2002.
2. He could revamp his ineffective ‘bishop accountability’ law, Vos estis lux mundi, which even his own advisor, Fr. Hans Zollner, S.J, describes as ‘not working.’ The Pope could clean house, country after country, removing complicit bishops, stripping them of their titles, and publishing accounts of their wrongdoing. He might as well start in Portugal; he should publicly denounce and remove bishops’ conference president José Ornelas and all of his colleagues who have demonstrated contempt for victims’ testimonies as well as resistance to compensating victims for the terrible harm inflicted on them by the church.
3. He could demonstrate transparency with a meaningful directive. He could order the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to release the names, assignment histories, and case files of the thousands of priests it has found guilty. He thereby would make common cause with abuse victims worldwide, as well as the 160 bishops and 32 religious superiors in the U.S. who have published at least partial lists of credibly accused priests.
Founded in 2003, BishopAccountability.org maintains the world’s largest archive of documents on the problem of clergy sexual abuse, outside the Holy See’s own archives. We conduct research on child sexual abuse by priests and religious and on the management of those cases by bishops and their staffs, superiors of religious orders, and the Holy See. An independent non-profit based in Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, BishopAccountability.org is not a victims’ advocacy group and is not affiliated with any church, reform, or victims’ organization.
Contact for BishopAccountability.org
Anne Barrett Doyle, Co-Director, BishopAccountability.org, [email protected]